Skip to content

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness Evaluation Software

Run Educator Effectiveness on the Danielson Framework for Teaching, across all four domains and 22 components, with SLOs and the Summary and Supporting year cycle built in.

Educator Effectiveness is the entry point, not the whole story. In EX in Education, EE evaluations connect to coaching, goals, PD, and retention, so every educator moves from hired to thriving.

Danielson Framework Aligned
4 Domains, 22 Components
Connected to Coaching

EE Classroom Observation

Proficient
Planning & Preparation
Learning Environments
Learning Experiences
Principled Teaching
Observations Completed
147
Feeds Into
Coaching & PD

Wisconsin's Educator Effectiveness System

The Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness (EE) System is the state's learning-centered approach to educator growth. The state model uses the Danielson Framework for Teaching for the evaluation of teaching, paired with Student and School Learning Objectives. Districts may run the state model or a DPI-approved equivalent. In EX in Education, that framework is the doorway into a connected system for coaching, PD, and retention.

4 Domains, 22 Components

The Danielson Framework for Teaching organizes practice across four connected domains and 22 components, each pre-configured in EX so evaluators score against the framework without rebuilding forms.

  • Planning and Preparation
  • Learning Environments
  • Learning Experiences
  • Principled Teaching

Student & School Learning Objectives

The EE System pairs the framework with Student and School Learning Objectives (SLOs). Educators develop at least one academic SLO each year and review it with their evaluator across the cycle. EX tracks the SLO evidence alongside observation results.

  • At least one SLO developed each year
  • Academic and based on standards
  • Grounded in assessment evidence
  • Reviewed at the end of the cycle

Complete Danielson Framework Coverage

All four Danielson domains and their 22 components are pre-built in EX in Education, so Wisconsin evaluators can observe, score, and generate evidence against the framework the state model uses from day one.

1

Planning & Preparation

What teachers do before instruction begins.

  • Knowing content and students
  • Setting instructional outcomes
  • Designing coherent instruction
  • Planning to assess learning
2

Learning Environments

The conditions and culture that make learning possible.

  • Respect and rapport
  • A culture for learning
  • Routines and procedures
  • A productive environment
3

Learning Experiences

Instruction as it happens in the classroom.

  • Communicating with students
  • Questioning and discussion
  • Engaging students in learning
  • Using assessment in instruction
4

Principled Teaching

Growth and responsibility beyond the lesson.

  • Reflecting on practice
  • Engaging families and community
  • Contributing to the school
  • Ongoing professional learning

Formal Observations

  • • Announced, with pre- and post-observation conferences
  • • Evidence across the Danielson domains
  • • Written feedback tied to the framework
  • • Central to the Summary year

Mini Observations

  • • Shorter visits between formal observations
  • • Brief, timely feedback
  • • Evidence gathered across the cycle
  • • Cadence set by the model and district

Trained observers: In the Wisconsin state model, evaluators and observers complete DPI Educator Effectiveness training before conducting observations that inform an educator's evaluation. EX tracks formal observations and mini-observations together, with reminders so districts stay on cycle.

The Educator Effectiveness Cycle, Tracked Over Time

Wisconsin's EE System runs on a multi-year cycle built around continuous improvement, not a single label. EX in Education keeps each educator's Summary and Supporting years together so growth is visible from one year to the next.

Summary Year

A teacher's first year and at least every third year after. The educator completes a Self-Review, develops an Educator Effectiveness Plan, is observed, and reviews SLOs and continuous-improvement practice across the cycle.

Supporting Years

The years in between. Educators carry their plan forward, develop an SLO each year, and meet with evaluators in cycle conferences to review data, adjust strategies, and reflect on progress.

Continuous Improvement

The system centers professional growth over a single summative score. Reflection, feedback, and next steps carry from year to year rather than resetting each cycle.

Because Wisconsin's EE System is designed around continuous improvement, EX in Education keeps each educator's cycle in one place, the Self-Review, Educator Effectiveness Plan, observations, SLOs, and reflections, and routes what surfaces into coaching so a cycle leads to next steps, not just a file. When a teacher moves between Summary and Supporting years, the history moves with them, so growth stays visible across the whole cycle instead of scattered across documents.

Built for Wisconsin's Evaluation Process

EX in Education gives Wisconsin districts what they need to run Educator Effectiveness aligned to the state model, then connects that evidence to coaching, PD, goals, and retention across every school.

Danielson-Aligned Forms

Observation forms pre-built for the four domains and 22 components of the Danielson Framework the state model uses.

  • • All four domains included
  • • Component-level evidence
  • • Practice-level scoring

Observation Cycles

Manage formal observations alongside shorter mini-observations, with scheduling and reminders in one connected system.

  • • Formal observations
  • • Mini observations
  • • Cycle reminders

SLO Tracking

Record each educator's Student or School Learning Objective, the assessment evidence behind it, and progress across the cycle.

  • • Academic, standards-based
  • • Evidence in one record
  • • Reviewed at cycle end

Coaching Handoff

Turn what an observation surfaces into a coaching cycle, so feedback leads to real support instead of a filed form.

  • • Evidence to coaching
  • • Structured feedback
  • • Follow-up visits

Plans & Self-Review

Keep the Self-Review, Educator Effectiveness Plan, and cycle conferences together in one record for each educator.

  • • Self-Review
  • • Educator Effectiveness Plan
  • • Cycle conferences

Growth Goals

Set professional goals tied to what the evaluation surfaced, tracked in the same module that follows a teacher across the year.

  • • Goal setting tools
  • • Progress tracking
  • • Linked to PD

Why Wisconsin Districts Run Educator Effectiveness Inside EX in Education

Run EE aligned to the state model, then use what the process surfaces to actually grow and keep your teachers. Evaluation is the doorway. Educator growth and retention is the product.

Less admin, more coaching

Structured workflows and feedback tools free evaluators to spend more of their time in coaching conversations, not paperwork.

Consistent across schools

Standard Danielson rubrics and processes help evaluators score consistently, whether it is one building or the whole district.

Growth you can see

SLOs, goals, and coaching history sit together, so progress is visible over time instead of scattered across files.

Retention, not just ratings

When feedback connects to PD, goals, and support, teachers keep developing, and districts keep the ones they worked hard to hire.

How AI Supports Educator Effectiveness Evaluations

AI in EX in Education helps evaluators work through EE faster while keeping every judgment in human hands. It drafts and organizes, evaluators decide.

Draft Feedback From Evidence

Turn observation notes into clear, component-aligned feedback that the evaluator reviews and edits before it is shared.

Organize Evidence by Component

Sort notes and artifacts against the Danielson components, so nothing is missed when it is time to score.

Suggest Growth Next Steps

Surface coaching moves and PD ideas tied to what an observation revealed, ready for the evaluator to assign.

Bring Educator Effectiveness Into the Bigger Picture

See how EX in Education runs Educator Effectiveness aligned to Wisconsin's state model, then connects evaluations to coaching, PD, goals, and retention across every school.

Built for the Wisconsin EE System. Bring your own model, or start from ours. Connected to coaching, PD, and goals.

Part of EX in Education

One piece of the educator experience.

Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness evaluations are one part of how districts support educators. In EX in Education, they connect to the bigger picture: walkthroughs, coaching, evaluations, goals, PD, recognition, surveys, and retention. Bring your own process, or start from a template, then run it across every school so every educator moves from hired to thriving.

Start a conversation